This topic has recently come to media attention again, as internal TfNSW documents have come to light confirming that the lines with greatest capacity constraints are the Western rail lines - which the Government's Second Harbour Crossing only indirectly improves. This post recaps and refines ideas for a Western Express line that adds large amounts of "blue sky" capacity rather than just an incremental improvement, and examines detailed alignment and station location issues.
"Blue Sky" Western Express rail line
For many years, the Rozelle Railyards have been woefully underutilised, despite being a vast (12 hectare) infrastructure asset strategically located in close proximity to the Sydney CBD. Formerly used as a freight corridor, it became disused and then partially converted into a light rail corridor for the Inner West light rail. There have been proposals to use it as a depot for the aborted CBD Metro project and other organisations such as Ecotransit have proposed extending light rail through it under Victoria road into White Bay and then through to Barangaroo. Whilst there certainly is ample room to extend it's light rail function, my fascination with the Rozelle Railyard is the potential it has for connection into Sydney's heavy rail system.
A better use of the Rozelle Railyards would be to use it as a rail corridor that connects the Main West railway line (eg. at Ashfield) to White Bay and then to Barangaroo. The details of the rail corridor alignment are discussed for each section below. Furthermore, this the Rozelle Railyard corridor is highly suitable for FastRail standards, as it has sufficient corridor width and flat grades needed to allow speeds of up to 200km/h.
Importantly, with the submerged Darling Harbour station option
(detailed under Option B in subsection 3 below), the patronage of
this corridor is not just limited to the Barangaroo catchment area
itself, but also provides a Wynyard “substitute” station via
Wynyard walk, and also provides an exit and pedestrian connection to
Pyrmont. Effectively, the Option B station serves three catchment
areas and not just the Barangaroo catchment alone.
1. Main West Line connection to Rozelle Railyards
Ashfield is one logical connection point. It is only 3.6km away from
the western end of the Rozelle Railyards, so would be a relatively
short tunnel. The average grades are approximately 2.7-2.9%, making
it suitable for a heavy rail tunnel.
The other reason for using Ashfield is that it is a turnback station
for inner west line trains. (There is also a carpark adjacent to
Ashfield station, should it be necessary to expand turnback
facilities further). An alternative to Ashfield would be a longer
tunnel to Strathfield. This could allow a potentially higher speed
journey as the tunnel could be made less curved and less steep.
2. Rozelle Railyards to Pyrmont
The width of the Rozelle Railyards is approximately 80m. This is
more than adequate for the one or more pairs of heavy rail tracks to
be added along side the existing light rail track and may even by
suitable for fast rail or high speed rail use.
At Victoria road, the Rozelle Railyards narrow to approximately 30m,
but the Inner West light rail tracks have branched off at this point
and so the whole corridor can be used for heavy rail to pass under
Victoria road into White Bay.
At White Bay, a number of alignments are possible. The alignment
used by the CBD Metro proposed by the NSW Government in 2009 is shown
below. (This corridor is protected under the NSW Infrastructure 2007
SEPP). Given that Pyrmont is already serviced by light rail, White
Bay would be the preferred site of a station, which could be built
cost effectively as a surface grade station, or as a cut and cover
underground station. Alternatively, if fast rail speeds of 200km/h are to be achieved, the White Bay station should also be dropped, in which case trains will run express all the way through to the CBD.
3. Pyrmont to Barangaroo
A corridor from Pyrmont to Barangaroo is also protected by the NSW
Infrastructure 2007 SEPP. However, unlike the former CBD Metro
project, it is proposed that the “Blue Sky” Western Express
tracks (in the initial stage) terminate at Barangaroo rather than
continue south to Central. This is because most of the benefit
derives from direct CBD North access, and it has been outlined
previously that Wynyard/Barangaroo is the primary capacity-constrained station
catchment, with other CBD stations less constrained. Furthermore,
there is substantial incremental cost in tunnelling though CBD
environments with complexities of constructing underground stations
and avoiding basements, utility infrastructure and pre-existing road
and rail tunnels. As a result, the greatest benefit to cost is
obtained by terminating the line initially at Barangaroo.
Although two water crossings are necessary on both the west and east
side of Pyrmont, both of these are under shallow water, with a water
depth of approximately 10m-15m along the corridor. It is probably for
the water depth reason that the CBD Metro chose the Pyrmont
alignment.
At Barangaroo/Wynyard, a number of station options are possible.
Option A: Station as marked out in NSW Infrastructure 2007 SEPP
The former CBD Metro proposed an underground station below
Sussex/Kent St:
Option B: Station under Darling Harbour, connecting Pyrmont Bay
Park and King Street Wharf at Barangaroo South.
The advantage of this station is that it can service
Barangaroo/Wynyard (the eastern exit of the station being only 100m
away from Wynyard Walk) as well as Pyrmont (the western end of the
station exit coming out directly in front of the Pyrmont light rail
station). Additionally, it provides a pedestrian crossing from
Pyrmont to Barangaroo. It also avoids complexity of tunnelling under
Barangaroo.
The construction options available are either:
1. A coffer-dam
2. Immersed tube: a common dimension
(variable length, fixed width and height) immersed tube structure
could be built at a dry dock facility and then towed into place. And
then finishing work being done with coffer dams. There are two essential water crossings. A minimum span of 170m near the Anzac Bridge. A span of 320-360m forming the Barangaroo station itself (depending on the angle) and potentially another crossing of Darling Harbour near the Pyrmont Bridge of roughly 270m. Each of these could be lowered into place and then a coffer dam formed around the ends so that construction could be completed at both ends at once. (This process would simplify the need to maintain navigability).
3. A triplet of tunnels in ground rock underneath Darling Harbour, with the platform constructed in the middle tunnel. This would be deeper than an immersed station above ground rock, but could possibly be cheaper to construct.
No comments:
Post a Comment